By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
In a recent opinion piece titled “Is the Philippines at War Right Now?” by Jun Abines, several alarming assertions are made regarding the relationship between the Philippines and the United States. The article claims that the Philippines is essentially at the onset of a second Filipino-American war, with the U.S. allegedly transforming the nation into a de facto colony through its military presence. While these assertions are provocative, they fail to hold up under scrutiny from historical, legal, and practical perspectives.
First, let’s address the historical context. The Filipino-American War (1899-1902) was indeed a dark chapter marked by significant loss of life and complex political dynamics. However, drawing a direct parallel to the current U.S. military presence in the Philippines under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) is misleading. The EDCA, established in 2014, is a mutual defense agreement aimed at enhancing the defensive capabilities of the Philippines, not an occupation force. The historical precedent of colonialism does not apply here; rather, this is a strategic partnership based on mutual consent and legal frameworks.
Legally, the presence of U.S. troops and military bases under EDCA is entirely different from an occupation. The EDCA stipulates that these bases remain under Philippine sovereignty and jurisdiction, with U.S. military personnel operating under clearly defined legal boundaries. This arrangement respects the Philippines’ sovereignty and provides it with a security umbrella in an increasingly tense regional environment, particularly concerning China’s expansive claims in the South China Sea.
The author’s assertion that the U.S. is fortifying its positions to subjugate the Philippines is also not supported by evidence. The U.S. has shown consistent respect for Philippine sovereignty and its democratic institutions. Claims of the U.S. orchestrating chaos to justify its presence, reminiscent of tactics allegedly used in other conflict zones, are speculative at best and unfounded.
In terms of international relations, it is crucial to consider the Philippines’ strategic importance. The Philippines, with its significant geographic location, serves as a critical ally in maintaining regional security and balance. The U.S.-Philippines alliance plays a pivotal role in countering Chinese aggression in the South China Sea, a point underscored by the 2016 ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which invalidated China’s expansive nine-dash line claims. The U.S. support in upholding this ruling aligns with international law and supports the Philippines’ maritime rights.
Contrary to the opinion piece, there is substantial evidence that the U.S. military presence acts as a deterrent against Chinese expansionism rather than a precursor to conflict. The rotational presence of U.S. forces and joint military exercises enhance the defensive capabilities of the Philippines, thereby contributing to regional stability. Historical precedents of U.S. military alliances, such as NATO, demonstrate how such partnerships can provide security and prevent conflict rather than provoke it.
However, the article does raise a valid point about the need for transparency regarding the operations and intentions of U.S. forces stationed in the Philippines. It is essential for the Philippine government to maintain clear communication with its citizens and ensure that all activities under EDCA are transparent and accountable. This transparency will help alleviate fears of undue influence and reinforce the sovereignty and mutual respect that underpin the agreement.
The call for unity among Filipinos is a poignant reminder in these turbulent times. Rather than fostering fear and division, it is imperative that Filipinos unite to understand the true nature of international partnerships and the geopolitical realities that affect their nation. Misinformation and sensationalism only serve to weaken the fabric of national unity and distract from genuine threats.
In conclusion, while Jun Abines’ article stirs up considerable concern, a closer examination reveals that many of its assertions do not hold up against historical facts, legal standards, or the current geopolitical context. The U.S.-Philippines relationship, governed by agreements like the EDCA, is designed to enhance mutual security and stability in the region. The Philippines must continue to assert its sovereignty while leveraging these international partnerships to safeguard its national interests. Unity, transparency, and informed dialogue are essential as the nation navigates these complex dynamics.
- ₱75 Million Heist: Cops Gone Full Bandit
- ₱6.7-Trillion Temptation: The Great Pork Zombie Revival and the “Collegial” Vote-Buying Circus
- ₱1.9 Billion for 382 Units and a Rooftop Pool: Poverty Solved, Next Problem Please
- ₱1.35 Trillion for Education: Bigger Budget, Same Old Thieves’ Banquet
- ₱1 Billion Congressional Seat? Sorry, Sold Out Na Raw — Si Bello Raw Ang Hindi Bumili
- “We Will Take Care of It”: Bersamin’s P52-Billion Love Letter to Corruption
- “Skewed Narrative”? More Like Skewered Taxpayers!
- “Scared to Sign Vouchers” Is Now Official GDP Policy – Welcome to the Philippines’ Permanent Paralysis Economy
KWEBA ni BAROK 
Leave a comment