The Marcos-Enrile Divide: The Constitutional Crisis Behind the INC Rally

By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo — January 17, 2025

WHAT happens when a constitutional process becomes the battlefield of political giants? The impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte has divided the Philippine government, with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. fearing the distraction of the process, while Juan Ponce Enrile sees a much darker future if the charges are dismissed. With the rule of law hanging in the balance, the country stands on the brink of a critical decision

This high-stakes clash is further complicated by the Iglesia ni Cristo’s (INC) public display of support for Marcos’ opposition to the impeachment, raising questions about the role of religious groups in shaping political decisions.

Enrile’s Stand: A Defense of Constitutional Principles

Juan Ponce Enrile, a stalwart of Philippine law and politics, has taken a firm stand in favor of impeachment, framing his argument around the sanctity of the Constitution and the rule of law.

In his words, the INC rally implies a dangerous precedent—an erosion of constitutional principles in favor of collective influence. Enrile asks piercing questions:

Can the INC, despite its significant following, amend or suspend constitutional provisions?
Are Filipinos prepared to sacrifice the rule of law for the sake of personal or group loyalty?
What are the long-term consequences of allowing such moves to undermine justice and accountability?

Enrile argues that impeachment is not a punishment but a constitutional mechanism to address allegations of misconduct by public officials. The charges against Duterte—ranging from corruption and plunder to betrayal of public trust—are severe, and ignoring them would risk normalizing impunity in public office.

Marcos’ Stance: A Strategic Maneuver or a Sign of Weakness?

President Marcos has voiced reservations about pursuing impeachment, describing it as a potential distraction from governance. He asserts that the process would waste time and resources better spent on improving Filipino lives. However, his acknowledgment of Enrile’s stance as “seriously considered” reveals an underlying tension within the administration.

Is Marcos prioritizing political stability over accountability? Or is he subtly signaling caution in a complex power dynamic with the Duterte camp?

The INC Rally: A Show of Influence

The INC’s nationwide rally in support of Marcos’ position highlights the significant role religious groups play in Philippine politics. While such movements can mobilize massive support, Enrile’s critique raises valid concerns: should public opinion, even from influential groups, override constitutional processes?

The rally underscores the delicate balance between political alliances and the rule of law. It also reflects the complexities of governing in a society where religious and political loyalties often intertwine.

The Allegations Against Duterte: Serious and Substantiated?

Vice President Duterte faces accusations that strike at the heart of public trust:

Violation of the Constitution
Betrayal of Public Trust
Plunder and Malversation
Bribery and Graft

The complaints are backed by Akbayan Party-list Rep. Perci Cendaña, who warns of the dangers of inaction. According to Cendaña, delaying the impeachment emboldens Duterte to pursue higher office, risking further erosion of democratic principles.

Yet, questions linger:

How strong is the evidence against Duterte?
Are these charges politically motivated, or do they reflect genuine misconduct?
What does this mean for Duterte’s rumored 2028 presidential bid?

The Impeachment Process: A Test of Philippine Democracy

As the nation grapples with these pressing questions, Enrile’s arguments demand serious consideration. Can the Philippines afford to ignore constitutional processes for political convenience? What message does this send to future leaders?

The stakes are high. Failure to address these impeachment complaints could erode public trust in institutions, deepen political polarization, and weaken the foundations of democracy.

The time for decisive action is now. Will the House of Representatives uphold its duty to pursue justice, or will it succumb to the pressures of political expediency?

The answers to these questions will shape the trajectory of Philippine democracy in the years to come.