Democracy Goes Digital: Revolutionizing Local Governance Through Livestreaming

By Louis ‘Barok‘ C Biraogo — January 19, 2025

TRANSPARENCY in governance has long been a buzzword—but House Bill No. 11294 dares to turn rhetoric into reality by mandating the livestreaming of local council sessions. Is this the accountability tool we’ve been waiting for, or a logistical nightmare in disguise? Here’s a closer look at the bill’s promises, pitfalls, and paths forward.

Key Provisions of House Bill No. 11294

Rep. Ron Salo’s proposed bill introduces amendments to Republic Act No. 7160 (Local Government Code of 1991) to institutionalize livestreaming practices. Key provisions include:

Mandatory Livestreaming: Regular and special sessions of municipal and city councils must be broadcast live.
Accessible Platforms: Social media platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, and X are designated for these streams, ensuring wide reach.
Archiving for Transparency: Recordings of the livestreams must be available upon public request to create an enduring record of discussions.
Guidelines Formation: Councils will develop specific guidelines for livestreaming as part of their internal rules.

Livestreaming and Local Governance: A New Era of Transparency?

1. Enhanced Transparency and Accountability

Livestreaming will shine a light on legislative proceedings, ensuring that officials are conscious of their words and actions.
A digital record of council sessions reduces opportunities for misinformation or misrepresentation, promoting accountability.

2. Increased Public Engagement

Citizens gain a front-row seat to legislative discussions, fostering an informed and engaged populace.
Livestreaming may bridge the gap between local governments and remote constituents, encouraging active participation.

3. Deterrence of Corruption

The visibility of discussions could deter corrupt practices, as officials will be under constant public scrutiny.

Livestreaming Local Council Meetings: Obstacles and Hurdles

1. Technical Limitations

Some LGUs lack the infrastructure to support consistent, high-quality livestreaming.
Connectivity issues in rural areas may limit citizens’ access, undermining inclusivity.

2. Digital Divide

Marginalized communities may lack the necessary devices or internet access to participate in livestreamed sessions, creating inequity.

3. Risk of Manipulation

Livestreams could be curated or edited to favor certain narratives, raising concerns about authenticity.

4. Financial Implications

Setting up livestreaming systems and training personnel will require funding, which could strain smaller LGUs.

5. Data Privacy and Security

Safeguarding sensitive discussions and preventing unauthorized access to livestream archives will be crucial.

The Livestreaming Bill: A Look at the Political Realities

1. Power Dynamics

Livestreaming will inevitably shift power dynamics, empowering citizens while increasing pressure on local officials.
Political actors resistant to transparency may attempt to undermine or delay implementation.

2. Need for Cultural Change

An institutionalized culture of openness is essential. Livestreaming alone cannot reform governance; a broader commitment to accountability is needed.

The People’s Perspective: How Livestreaming Affects Filipinos

The Filipino people stand to benefit immensely if the bill is implemented effectively:

Empowerment of Marginalized Voices: Real-time access to governance allows marginalized groups to hold local leaders accountable.
Educational Opportunities: Citizens, especially students, can learn about legislative processes, fostering civic awareness.

However, without addressing access disparities, the initiative risks alienating those already excluded from governance.

Recommendations

Phased Implementation: Begin with pilot projects in well-equipped LGUs to address technical challenges and create replicable models.
Infrastructure Investment: Allocate resources for internet expansion, especially in rural areas, to ensure equitable access.
Capacity Building: Train LGU staff in livestreaming technologies and ethical communication practices.
Public Awareness Campaigns: Educate citizens about the initiative, emphasizing how they can participate and use the information effectively.
Safeguards Against Manipulation: Enforce guidelines for unaltered livestreams and transparent archival practices.
Periodic Reviews: Establish mechanisms to evaluate the program’s effectiveness and address emerging challenges.

Conclusion

House Bill No. 11294 marks a significant step toward modernizing local governance in the Philippines. By institutionalizing transparency through digital technology, the bill has the potential to enhance accountability, foster public trust, and empower citizens. However, its success hinges on addressing infrastructure gaps, the digital divide, and potential resistance. Lawmakers, LGUs, and civil society must collaborate to ensure this initiative translates into meaningful and inclusive change.