By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo — February 7, 2025
SPEAKER Ferdinand Martin Romualdez stood before the House of Representatives, delivering a speech laced with moral conviction. The legislature, he declared, had fought “the forces of darkness and evil.” It had upheld the rule of law, ensuring that “no ambition is above the Constitution.” His words landed like a gavel strike—resolute, forceful, final.
But behind the grand rhetoric lies a political reality that is far more complex. The House’s adjournment came in the wake of the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte, a move that—regardless of merit—has fractured the ruling coalition and sent shockwaves through Philippine politics. Romualdez presents himself as the steward of a “New Philippines,” built on accountability and reform. Yet, as history has often shown, power shifts in ways that serve not just the people, but also the ambitions of those wielding it.
Is Romualdez truly the architect of a political renaissance, or is he consolidating power under the guise of governance?
Beyond the Rhetoric: Examining Romualdez’s Record and Its Impact on Philippine Politics
By the numbers, Romualdez’s tenure as Speaker is impressive: 75 bills passed into national law and 112 local laws enacted, a legislative feat that his allies hail as proof of his effectiveness. The House under his leadership has prioritized infrastructure, job creation, and social welfare—hallmarks of an administration seeking to leave a lasting legacy.
Among these legislative achievements, key measures have indeed benefited ordinary Filipinos. Investments in infrastructure promise long-term economic gains, and targeted social programs offer relief to the vulnerable. But in the rough terrain of Philippine politics, numbers alone do not tell the full story. Many of these laws align seamlessly with Malacañang’s priorities, raising a critical question: Has Romualdez been a visionary legislator, or merely an efficient enforcer of the Marcos administration’s agenda?
This distinction matters. While Romualdez boasts legislative productivity, true leadership is tested not by the number of laws passed, but by the willingness to challenge entrenched interests—even when it is politically inconvenient.
The Rule of Law: Principle or Power Play?
The impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte is being framed as an affirmation of the rule of law. Romualdez asserts that “no one—no matter how powerful—is immune from the will of the people.” Yet, skeptics cannot ignore the power dynamics at play.
For years, the Marcos and Duterte factions have maintained an uneasy alliance, bound by political expediency rather than ideological unity. The House’s overwhelming endorsement of Duterte’s impeachment suggests a decisive break. The articles of impeachment—ranging from allegations of graft to threats against the President—paint a damning picture of a vice president once seen as untouchable.
But is this an act of principle, or a masterstroke of political survival?
Romualdez’s insistence on accountability is commendable, but selective enforcement of the rule of law is not true justice. If the impeachment marks a genuine shift toward governance over dynastic loyalty, will the same rigorous scrutiny be applied to allies within the administration? Or is this a strategic purge, removing a rival ahead of 2028?
The “New Philippines”: Genuine Reform or Rebranded Politics?
Romualdez speaks of a “New Philippines” that is accountable, progressive, and governed by the people’s interests. It is a compelling vision. The Philippines, battered by political dynasties, corruption, and economic stagnation, desperately needs new leadership that values institutions over personalities.
But history offers cautionary tales. Political figures who promise reform often end up reinforcing the very power structures they claim to dismantle. Will Romualdez’s “New Philippines” be different? Will it be a break from patronage politics or merely a continuation under a different banner?
If Romualdez is serious about good governance, his leadership must extend beyond rhetoric. He must prove that accountability is not a weapon wielded against enemies but a principle applied universally. If he champions transparency, he must ensure it is institutionalized, not merely performative.
The Philippines at a Crossroads: A Nation in Transition
Romualdez’s recent moves have positioned him as a formidable contender for 2028. He presents himself as a leader who upholds the Constitution, champions reform, and resists political manipulation. But the true measure of his leadership will not be found in fiery speeches or impeachment victories—it will be in the long-term strength of Philippine institutions.
Will Romualdez’s “New Philippines” deliver on its promises, or is it merely a prelude to another chapter of political maneuvering? If he aspires to lead, he must ensure that his legacy is one of genuine reform—not just of political survival.
Filipinos are watching. And history, as Romualdez himself said, will judge.
- “Forthwith” to Farce: How the Senate is Killing Impeachment—And Why Enrile’s Right (Even If You Can’t Trust Him)
- “HINDI AKO NAG-RESIGN!”
- “I’m calling you from my new Globe SIM. Send load!”
- “Mahiya Naman Kayo!” Marcos’ Anti-Corruption Vow Faces a Flood of Doubt
- “Meow, I’m calling you from my new Globe SIM!”
- “PLUNDER IS OVERRATED”? TRY AGAIN — IT’S A CALCULATED KILL SHOT
- “Shimenet”: The Term That Broke the Internet and the Budget
- “We Did Not Yield”: Marcos’s Stand and the Soul of Filipino Sovereignty
- “We Gather Light to Scatter”: A Tribute to Edgardo Bautista Espiritu
- $150M for Kaufman to Spin a Sinking Narrative
- $2 Trillion by 2050? Manila’s Economic Fantasy Flimsier Than a Taho Cup
- $26 Short of Glory: The Philippines’ Economic Hunger Games Flop
KWEBA ni BAROK 
Leave a comment