Edwin Mercado’s private-sector groveling won’t stitch up PhilHealth’s wounds—it’s just tossing bandages to his hospital pals while the poor bleed out.
By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo — July 21, 2025
Vignette: Aling Maria’s Rice-Cake Rx
In a Quezon City slum, Aling Maria, a diabetic grandmother, hawks suman to scrape together insulin money. PhilHealth’s dialysis package is a distant dream; the nearest accredited hospital, two jeepneys away, hasn’t seen a peso from PhilHealth since 2023. “They say there’s cash,” she sighs, “but all I get are bills.” Her story is the pulse of a healthcare system flatlining, where the poor barter rice cakes for survival while PhilHealth’s ₱600 billion reserves mock them from gilded vaults.
ACT I: The ₱89.9B Treasury Swindle—Robbing the Sick to Fund the Slick
The ₱89.9 billion fund transfer to the National Treasury, greenlit by the 2024 General Appropriations Act, is less fiscal policy than daylight robbery. The Universal Health Care Act (UHCA) demands surplus funds cut member premiums or boost benefits—not bankroll the government’s “unprogrammed” pet projects. Retired Justice Antonio Carpio and over 65 medical groups screamed betrayal, and the Supreme Court is now probing this legalized looting. Dr. Tony Leachon called it a “moral and economic catastrophe,” and he’s spot-on. Siphoning healthcare funds to inflate budget balloons is like snatching oxygen tanks from a hospital to blow up party floats.
ACT II: ₱600B in the Bank, Yet Begging for Band-Aids
PhilHealth’s SOS to the private sector while hoarding ₱600 billion in reserves is a farce worthy of a teleserye cliffhanger. This agency could outfit every Filipino with a stethoscope, yet it’s crying broke, blaming a zero-subsidy 2025 budget. The Philstar article lays bare the irony: Congress axed PhilHealth’s ₱74 billion subsidy, pointing to those reserves, but the Commission on Audit (COA) slapped an “adverse opinion” on the agency’s books for mismanagement. Hospitals are drowning in ₱59.6 billion in unpaid claims (PDF), including ₱4 billion for pandemic services. Mercado’s plea is a magician’s misdirection, hiding systemic rot while he passes the hat to corporate cronies.
ACT III: Mercado’s Curtain Call—Noble Exit or Guilty Slink?
Edwin Mercado’s courtesy resignation in May 2025, mere months after his February appointment, is either a martyr’s bow or a coward’s shuffle. Was he a fall guy for inherited chaos, or did he bolt before the Supreme Court’s gavel dropped? His tenure kicked off amid the ₱89.9 billion scandal, and his admission of lost public trust during oral arguments didn’t win hearts. X posts, like Dr. Leachon’s, seethed: “Resignation doesn’t fix the ₱89.9B betrayal.” Whether pushed or fleeing, Mercado’s brief stint screams a leadership void where accountability goes to sulk.
Mercado’s Reign: Scalpel of Reform or Corporate Wrecking Ball?
The Case for Mercado: A Doctor’s Dreamy Fixes
Mercado, a 35-year hospital management veteran, brought a surgeon’s precision to PhilHealth’s mess. His push for digitalization, inspired by Korean health agencies, aimed to yank claims processing from its manual purgatory. “PhilHealth’s services are good, but claims processing is stuck in the Stone Age,” he said, and he’s not wrong—reimbursements crawl at 25 days against a 60-day legal limit. His primary-care focus, redirecting funds from pricey inpatient services to prevention, mirrors global health wisdom. If executed, it could save billions while keeping Filipinos out of hospital beds. Mercado’s hope for a ₱53.2 billion 2026 subsidy shows he’s at least trying to suture Congress’s budget gash.
The Case Against Mercado: A Corporate Con in Scrubs
But hold the applause. Mercado’s SOS reeks of a Trojan horse for corporate capture, given his past running Qualimed Health Network. Critics, like the Civil Society PhilHealth Study Group, warn that inviting hospital chains to “fill gaps” could skew benefits toward high-margin procedures, leaving the poor with scraps. His claim that “members feel improvements” is a cruel jest when hospitals choke on ₱59.6 billion in unpaid claims, forcing service cuts or ward closures. The zero-subsidy fiasco unfolded under his nose, exposing limp lobbying or a failure to sway Congress. Worse, his private-sector plea dodges accountability for systemic leaks—₱15 billion in “deficient” payments and shady IT contracts, per the 2021 COA audit. His Korean digitalization dream? So far, it’s a PowerPoint mirage.
The SOS Scam: Genuine Panic or Political Puppeteering?
Is PhilHealth’s SOS a desperate lifeline or a staged sob story to bully Congress? The truth slinks in the shadows. The zero-subsidy 2025 budget, plus ₱59.6 billion in unpaid claims and delayed sin-tax funds, creates a cash-flow cliff—PhilHealth’s actuarial life is a measly 1.2 years, per a 2024 DOF study. Yet, with ₱600 billion in reserves, the “crisis” feels like a scripted wail to force a ₱53.2 billion 2026 subsidy. Mercado’s public hand-wringing could be a ploy to deflect blame from internal rot to external defunding. The Supreme Court’s probe into the ₱89.9 billion transfer adds spice: if deemed illegal, it could spark a fiscal fire, making the SOS a preemptive smoke screen.
And then there’s the “privatize-the-gap” farce, ripe for satire. PhilHealth’s begging bowl is out to HMOs and hospital chains—next up, GoFundMe for ventilators? Workers, bled dry by mandatory contributions, could face user fees if private players demand profits. It’s double taxation dressed as charity: pay premiums, then pay again when the system fails. If this is the future, expect hospital wings branded like Jollibee: “QualiCare Dialysis, now with extra fries!”
Filipinos’ Fate: A Dystopian Healthcare Hunger Games
The Poor: Pawns in a Patronage Plague
For the indigent, PhilHealth’s collapse is a dystopian nightmare. Imagine Aling Maria, forced to trade votes for Medical Assistance to Indigent Patients (MAIP), which ballooned to ₱74 billion in 2025 but serves 17 times fewer patients than PhilHealth’s 12.7 million in 2023. MAIP’s discretionary handouts scream patronage, turning healthcare into a politician’s IOU. With infant mortality at 22 per 1,000 and maternal mortality at 154 per 100,000, the poor face a grim gamble: beg for political scraps or die waiting. X user katyrmiese nails it: “We pay contributions, but where’s the healthcare?”
Systemic Collapse: VIP Lounges vs. Barrio Bedlam
The SOS risks spawning a two-tier healthcare hell: private-funded “VIP wards” for the paying elite and jam-packed public clinics for the rest. The Philstar article hints at this divide, noting private investment may favor urban, high-margin hospitals over rural clinics. With out-of-pocket spending at 44.4%, a privatized gap could push costs higher, shredding universal healthcare’s promise. Rural areas, already short on providers, risk becoming ghost wards while the rich sip lattes in Qualimed’s plush suites. Social solidarity? Buried under corporate greed.
Prescriptions with Punch: Stop Cooking Filipinos in Their Own Grease
PhilHealth’s crisis needs surgery, not Band-Aids. Here’s the fix:
- Slam the Brakes on the Heist: The Supreme Court must declare the ₱89.9 billion transfer illegal and return the funds to PhilHealth. As Dr. Leachon quipped, “Stop frying Filipinos in their own fat.” Use the cash to clear the ₱59.6 billion claims backlog or cut premiums, not fund government pipe dreams.
- PhilHealth Purge: AI Over Apparatchiks: Sack the board and install auditors backed by AI to sniff out ghost claims and corrupt contracts. The 2021 COA audit’s ₱15 billion in “deficient” payments (PDF) proves humans can’t be trusted. AI-driven claims processing could slash delays and save billions.
- Sin-Tax Salvation: Ditch the PPP obsession—if public-private partnerships are the answer, the question’s wrong. Hike sin taxes on cigarettes, alcohol, and sugar to fund PhilHealth sustainably. Chase down the ₱45 billion in uncollected premiums from delinquent employers while you’re at it.
- Equity or Bust: Any private-sector deal must prioritize rural clinics and indigent care, with strict fee caps. Demand full transparency: publish PPP contracts under COA scrutiny to keep Mercado’s hospital buddies from cashing in.
- Primary Care Power-Up: Double down on Mercado’s primary-care push, but fund it with reserves, not hot air. Tele-consults, health coaches, and diagnostics can keep Filipinos healthy, saving lives and pesos.
Epilogue: A System on a Ventilator
PhilHealth’s SOS isn’t just a funding cry—it’s the death rattle of a healthcare system betrayed by greed and incompetence. Mercado’s digital dreams and primary-care pivot are noble, but they’re drowned out by the stench of mismanagement and corporate opportunism. The poor, like Aling Maria, don’t want VIP wards; they want a system that doesn’t force them to choose between medicine and meals. Until PhilHealth stops begging and starts rebuilding, universal healthcare will remain a cruel joke—one where ₱600 billion gathers dust while Filipinos sell suman to survive.
Key Citations
- PhilStar, 2025: PhilHealth sends funding SOS to private sector – Details Mercado’s appeal to the private sector and the zero-subsidy 2025 budget.
- Daily Tribune, 2025: PhilHealth’s Many Controversies: A Timeline – Chronicles the ₱89.9 billion transfer, unpaid claims, and Mercado’s resignation.
- BusinessWorld, 2024: SC Asked to Rule on 2025 Budget Blank Items, PhilHealth Defunding: Covers legal challenges to the fund transfer and defunding.
- BusinessWorld, 2025: Defunding Social Health Insurance in Favor of Medical Ayuda -Analyzes the shift to MAIP and its patronage risks.
- 2021 Commission on Audit (COA) Report on PhilHealth (PDF): Cited for the 2021 audit’s ₱15 billion in “deficient” payments and “adverse opinion” on PhilHealth’s finances.
- Department Circular No. 003.2024: Notes PhilHealth’s 1.2-year actuarial life.
- Bredenkamp, C., & Buisman, L. R. (2018). The challenges of the Philippines’ social health insurance programme in the era of Universal Health Coverage. Health Systems & Reform, 4(4), 303–312. — Study on PhilHealth’s inefficiency and fraud.
- Study Group: Estimates 12–15% leakage in annual benefit payouts.
- X Posts by Dr. Tony Leachon and katyrmiese: Reflect public outrage over trust and access issues.

- From Epal to Zero: Secretary Herbosa Takes on Patronage Politics… While the Usual Suspects File Another Round of Ombudsman Complaints

- The Millionaires’ Club Harbors a Fugitive: How Senator Bato dela Rosa Turned the Philippine Senate into a Hideout for the ICC-Haunted

- AFP’s Official Stance: The Filipino People Are Worth Fighting For… Just File Your Resignation First

- P6.793 Trillion Later, the Solution Is… More Palace Permission Slips? The Flood Scandal’s Most Expensive Band-Aid Yet

- Palace’s “Immediate Action” Panic: When a Vlogger’s Unproven Drug Claims and Fake Nudes Threaten Tourism More Than Actual Crises

- De Lima & Erice vs. The P150.9 Billion Ghost Fund: When the Ex-Detainee and the Eternal Opposition Finally Fight the Real Pork

- From Pork Barrel Watchdog to Marcos’ Lapdog: Ping Lacson’s Astonishing Transformation in One Budget Cycle

- Malacañang Freaks Out Over Chavit’s Rally Cry—Yet the Massive Flood Graft Scandal Gets the Silent Treatment

- Gatchalian Fights Back Tears for Toyota and Mitsubishi: After All, Who Will Think of the Poor Car Companies If Not Him?

- Historic Budget, Historic Hypocrisy

- From Anti-Anomaly Crusader to Alleged Kickback King: The Villanueva Rebrand Nobody Asked For

- Gretchen, Atong, and the Missing Sabungeros: When ‘Cheating’ Costs More Than a Bet









Leave a comment