Sovereignty Shield or Senate Snuggie? Bato’s New Legal Blanket Has ICC Written All Over It
By Louis “Barok” C. Biraogo — November 9, 2025
Radio Rumor vs. Mass Grave: When “Good Authority” Trumps 6,000+ Bodies
It started with a whisper on dzRH—a public interest radio program—and exploded into a constitutional cage match. Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Ping” Remulla, speaking with measured confidence, revealed that the International Criminal Court (ICC) had allegedly issued an arrest warrant for Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa. His source? “Good authority.”
No sealed document. No Interpol alert. Just a radio disclosure that sent Malacañang scrambling and human rights lawyers cheering.
Meanwhile, thousands of families still mourn victims of “Oplan Tokhang”—the knock-and-kill policy Bato helped design.
But here’s the twist: Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who once pledged “positive” action on ICC requests, now says—“Not so fast.”
Cue the legal circus.
Sovereignty Shield vs. Surrender Sword: Bersamin and Conti Duke It Out
Bersamin’s “Not So Fast” – A Procedural Wall in a Sovereignty Suit
Bersamin’s stance is polished and procedural:
“Even if the ICC issued a warrant, it needs Interpol transmission and a Philippine court order under the new extradition rules.”
He’s leaning on:
- Supreme Court Rules on Extradition (A.M. No. 21-07-09-SC) – requiring judicial review before surrender.
- Philippine withdrawal from the Rome Statute in 2019.
Reality check:
- Article 127(2), Rome Statute: Withdrawal does not erase jurisdiction over crimes before March 17, 2019.
- ICC Appeals Chamber, 2023: Already rejected Manila’s challenge to drug war probes.
- Bersamin in January 2025: “We’ll act positively.”
Bersamin in November 2025: “Not so fast.”
Consistency? Optional.
Conti’s “Arrest Is Certain” – The Legal Truth Serum
Kristina Conti, counsel for drug war victims, cuts through the fog:
“This isn’t extradition. This is surrender to an international tribunal. The ICC isn’t a state—it’s global justice.“
She’s dead right:
- Article 89, Rome Statute: Requests arrest and surrender, not extradition.
- Article 58, Rome Statute: Warrant issued → arrest follows.
- Duterte’s surrender (March 2025): Handled via Interpol—no court, no delay.
So why the special treatment for Bato?
Because Bersamin’s “new rules” apply to state requests, not ICC cooperation. The ICC isn’t a country. It’s a court.
Bersamin’s defense? A delay tactic dressed as due process.

Global Dragnet vs. Senate Bunker: Bato’s Great Escape Options
The ICC’s Global Playbook (No Polite Knocks Here)
The ICC doesn’t send postcards. It hunts:
| Tactic | Effect |
|---|---|
| Interpol Red Notice | Bato detained at any airport in 195 countries |
| Third-country arrest | One flight to Japan, EU, or Singapore = arrest |
| Diplomatic sanctions | EU freezes aid, bans PH officials |
| Public warrant release | Turns Bato into a global fugitive |
Remember al-Bashir? Nearly nabbed in South Africa. Bato’s not traveling light anymore.
Dela Rosa’s Evasion Strategies (Rated by Cynicism)
| Strategy | How It Works | Cynicism |
|---|---|---|
| The Bunker | Hide behind SC rules + sovereignty | 8/10 |
| The Senate Sanctuary | Sotto’s “institutional courtesy” | 10/10 |
| The Hermit | Never leave PH | 7/10 |
Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto III:
“No senator will be arrested in Senate premises.”
Article VI, Section 11, 1987 Constitution:
Immunity only for crimes ≤6 years.
Crimes against humanity? Life imprisonment.
Sotto’s “courtesy”? A constitutional fanfiction.
Karapatan’s rebuke:
“There is no dignity in shielding architects of mass murder.”
Barok’s verdict: Ouch.
Marcos’ Tightrope, Duterte’s Ghost, and the Moral Black Hole
The Marcos Administration’s High-Wire Act
- Cooperate → Anger Duterte’s base
- Resist → Anger the EU, UN, and global community
Current strategy: Stall. Delay. Deflect.
The “Betrayal” Soap Opera
Dela Rosa reportedly feels “betrayed” by Marcos Jr.
Barok’s take:
“You build a death machine, then cry foul when it turns on you? Welcome to politics, Senator.“
The Moral Vacuum
- 6,000+ official deaths
- 30,000+ estimated (HRW)
- Zero high-level convictions
Yet the government’s focus? Protecting a senator’s passport.
Republic Act No. 6713, Section 4(a):
“Public office is a public trust.”
Reality: It’s a VIP shield for the untouchable.
Endgame: Justice or Impunity? The Final Reckoning
Consequences at Stake
| Outcome | If Evades | If Surrendered |
|---|---|---|
| Rule of Law | Buried | Resurrected |
| ICC Authority | Mocked | Vindicated |
| Victims’ Justice | Denied | Delivered |
| PH Democracy | Laughingstock | Beacon |
Prescriptions (No Minced Words)
- To Malacañang:
End the charade. Surrender Bato under Article 89. Prove we’re not a rogue state. - To the ICC:
Go loud. Issue the Red Notice. Tag every embassy. Make harboring Bato radioactive. - To the Senate:
Drop the “courtesy” act. No one is above the law—not in the plenary, not in the gym. - To the Public:
Take the streets. This isn’t about one senator. It’s about whether state murder becomes policy.
Final Scene: The Soul of Justice on Trial
This is Act III of a decade-long legal thriller:
- Act I: “Kill them all”
- Act II: ICC probe
- Act III: Bato’s warrant
We’re at the climax.
Will justice prevail?
Or will impunity slip out the Senate backdoor—escorted by “institutional courtesy”?
The world is watching.
History is judging.
The ghosts of Tokhang are waiting.
Barok out.
Key Citations
- International Criminal Court. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. United Nations, 17 July 1998.
- International Criminal Court. Situation in the Republic of the Philippines: Decision on the Appeal of the Republic of the Philippines against the Decision Authorising the Resumption of the Investigation. ICC-01/21, 18 July 2023.
- Supreme Court of the Philippines. Rules on Extradition Proceedings. A.M. No. 21-07-09-SC, 2025, sc.judiciary.gov.ph.
- Supreme Court of the Philippines. “Rules on Extradition Proceedings (A.M. No. 22-03-29-SC).” Supreme Court of the Philippines, 8 Apr. 2025; uploaded 27 Oct. 2025. Accessed 9 Nov. 2025.
- Republic of the Philippines. The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Official Gazette.
- Republic of the Philippines. Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. Republic Act No. 6713, 20 Feb. 1989.
- Interpol. “Red Notices.” Interpol.
Justice delayed is justice denied. Unless you’re a senator—then it’s just “protocol.”

- “Forthwith” to Farce: How the Senate is Killing Impeachment—And Why Enrile’s Right (Even If You Can’t Trust Him)

- “HINDI AKO NAG-RESIGN!”

- “I’m calling you from my new Globe SIM. Send load!”

- “Mahiya Naman Kayo!” Marcos’ Anti-Corruption Vow Faces a Flood of Doubt

- “Meow, I’m calling you from my new Globe SIM!”

- “PLUNDER IS OVERRATED”? TRY AGAIN — IT’S A CALCULATED KILL SHOT

- “Shimenet”: The Term That Broke the Internet and the Budget

- “We Did Not Yield”: Marcos’s Stand and the Soul of Filipino Sovereignty

- “We Gather Light to Scatter”: A Tribute to Edgardo Bautista Espiritu

- $150M for Kaufman to Spin a Sinking Narrative

- $2 Trillion by 2050? Manila’s Economic Fantasy Flimsier Than a Taho Cup

- $26 Short of Glory: The Philippines’ Economic Hunger Games Flop









Leave a comment