Donate

KWEBA ni BAROK

,

Quiboloy’s Real Fear: Off-Key PNP Renditions of ‘Bakit Ngayon Ka Lang?’

Published by

Louis ‘Barok’ Biraogo

on

Quiboloy’s Real Fear: Off-Key PNP Renditions of ‘Bakit Ngayon Ka Lang?’

PNP’s Latest Tactic in Quiboloy Hunt: Sing Until He Surrenders

Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “Forthwith” to Farce: How the Senate is Killing Impeachment—And Why Enrile’s Right (Even If You Can’t Trust Him)
    By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo — June 20, 2025

    A CONSTITUTIONAL TRAINWRECK IN SLOW MOTION

    The Philippine Senate had one job: try Sara Duterte. Instead, on June 10, 2025, 18 senator-jurors staged a constitutional coup by remanding the impeachment articles back to the House—a move so legally dubious, it reeks of political arson[1]. The Constitution’s command is clear: once one-third of the House signs off, trial must proceed “forthwith”[2]. Yet here we are, four months later, drowning in procedural farce while the Senate whistles past its duty. Enter Juan Ponce Enrile, 101 years old and still the sharpest legal knife in the drawer. The Martial Law architect-turned-democracy whisperer is right about the Senate’s dereliction—but trust his legal brain, not his motives. This is the man who survived EDSA, the PDAF scam, and multiple regime changes by knowing exactly when to flip. Now, as Marcos’ chief legal counsel, he’s suddenly preaching constitutional fidelity[3]? Let’s dissect this mess—before impeachment becomes just another corpse in Congress’ graveyard of accountability.

    I. THE “FORTHWITH” FARCE: HOW THE SENATE BROKE IMPEACHMENT

    A. The Constitution’s Crystal-Clear Command

    Article XI, Section 3(4) doesn’t mince words:
    “Trial by the Senate shall Humanforthwith proceed.”
    The House did its job: 215 signatures (70% of members) on February 5—more than double the 102 needed[4]. The Senate’s duty was to gavel in, not dither. Yet:
    • Election break excuse: The Senate adjourned without reading the articles, violating “forthwith”[5].
    • Remand gambit: On June 10, Alan Peter Cayetano’s motion sent the case back, demanding the 20th Congress certify it—a requirement nowhere in the Constitution[6].
    Enrile’s verdict? “They tarried, they dilly-dallied… Worse, they commanded the House.”[7]

    B. Precedent Says: NO DELAYS, NO REMANDS

    History backs Enrile:
    • Corona (2012): As Senate President, Enrile rushed the trial—no remand, no certification demands[8].
    • Estrada (2000): Trial began immediately after House transmission[9].
    Now? The Senate’s “constitutional infirmities” excuse is a fiction—a delay tactic so transparent, it’s almost insulting.

    C. The Nuclear Precedent This Sets

    If the Senate can remand impeachments on whim:
    1. Future impeachments die by delay. Presidents/VPs could stall indefinitely.
    2. House independence erodes. The Senate just commanded a co-equal branch—a breach of comity[10].
    As Enrile warns: “This is a very dangerous situation.”[7]

    II. ENRILE: RIGHT ON LAW, SUSPECT ON MOTIVES

    A. The Legal Genius

    Enrile’s arguments are bulletproof:
    1. “Forthwith” means now. Not “after we stall.”
    2. The House’s work is presumed valid. The Senate isn’t a quality-control checkpoint[11].
    3. Impeachment is sui generis. It’s political—not a courtroom where technicalities kill cases[12].

    B. The Hypocrisy

    But let’s not canonize him:
    • Martial Law enabler: This is the man who helped Marcos Sr. dismantle democracy[13].
    • PDAF scam accused: His “constitutional purity” rings hollow post-pork barrel[14].
    • Marcos’ consigliere: As Bongbong’s lawyer, is he really neutral—or ensuring Duterte’s downfall helps his boss?[15]
    Trust his brain, not his heart.

    III. THE REAL STORY: POWER PLAYS & DIRTY SECRETS

    A. Follow the Money: The Confidential Funds Scandal

    The impeachment’s real fuel? Duterte’s ₱612M confidential fund mess:
    • Fake recipients: 60% of DepEd fund recipients don’t exist per PSA data[16].
    • OVP’s shady audits: No paper trail for millions—a gift to prosecutors[17].
    The Senate doesn’t want a trial airing this.

    B. The Assassination Bomb

    Article I alleges Duterte threatened to kill Marcos, Liza Araneta, and Speaker Romualdez[18]. A trial would force public testimony—political dynamite before 2028. No wonder the Senate punted.

    IV. THE ENDGAME: IMPEACHMENT OR IMPLOSION?

    Option 1: Senate Grows a Spine (LOL)

    • Proceed now. Try Duterte properly—no more delays.
    • Drop the remand farce. The House won’t re-certify; this is deadlock by design.

    Option 2: Supreme Court Steps In (Spoiler: They Won’t)

    Enrile suggests the SC could clarify—but the Court hates political grenades. Remember:
    • Corona’s revenge: The SC won’t risk another impeachment war[19].

    Option 3: Constitutional Chaos

    If impeachment dies:
    • Marcos consolidates. Duterte weakened, 2028 cleared.
    • No check left. Future VPs/Presidents become untouchable.

    FINAL VERDICT: DEMOCRACY LOSES

    Enrile’s right: the Senate must proceed—or admit impeachment is dead. But let’s not pretend this is just legal. It’s raw power—Marcos vs. Duterte, with Congress as collateral. The chilling question? If Congress won’t enforce the Constitution… who will? Epilogue: For those keeping score—yes, the Martial Law architect is now the Constitution’s last defender. Ironic? Absolutely. But in Philippine politics, hypocrisy is just texture.

    FOOTNOTES

    1. Enrile: It seems Sara Duterte doesn’t want to face impeachment trial (Inquirer) ↑
    2. Impeachment of Sara Duterte (Wikipedia) ↑
    3. How to fix impeachment impasse? Proceed with trial or go to SC – Enrile (Inquirer) ↑
    4. How to fix impeachment impasse? Proceed with trial or go to SC – Enrile (Inquirer) ↑
    5. Philippine Senate returns VP impeachment case to lower house (Reuters) ↑
    6. Philippine Trial of VP Sara Duterte Thrown Into Doubt by Senate (Bloomberg ) ↑
    7. Enrile interview on ANC (YouTube) ↑
    8. Impeachment of Renato Corona (Wikipedia) ↑
    9. Trial of Joseph Estrada (Wikipedia) ↑
    10. 1987 Philippine Constitution (LawPhil) ↑
    11. House stands firm on impeachment articles (YouTube) ↑
    12. Impeachment Primer and Frequently Asked Questions (UP Law) ↑
    13. Martial law under Ferdinand Marcos (Wikipedia) ↑
    14. Enrile and the PDAF Scam (PCIJ) ↑
    15. Enrile serving 2nd Marcos as chief legal counsel (Inquirer) ↑
    16. PSA Report on DepEd Funds (Philippine Statistics Authority) ↑
    17. COA Report on OVP Confidential Funds (Commission on Audit) ↑
    18. Full Text: Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte (PhilStar) ↑
    19. SC Decisions on Political Questions (Supreme Court) ↑
  • “HINDI AKO NAG-RESIGN!”
    The Executive Secretary Screams from the Grave of His Own Political Funeral

    By Louis “Barok” C. Biraogo — November 22, 2025

    1. The Resignation That Wasn’t: A Love Story in Two Contrasting Scripts

    Malacañang: “He stepped down out of delicadeza. So noble. So graceful. So very voluntary.”
    Lucas Bersamin, live on national television: “Hindi ako nag-resign.”

    Two narratives. One megaphone. Zero resignation letters.
    Welcome to Philippine governance in 2025 – where truth is whatever the Palace press release says it is… until the corpse starts talking back.

    He never resigned—his tongue just signed a loyalty waiver to the flood.

    2. Delicadeza: The Magical Word That Turns a Firing Squad into a Red-Carpet Exit

    Delicadeza™ – now available in “Extra Strength Cover-Up” flavor!
    Just sprinkle liberally whenever a high official becomes politically radioactive. Instantly transforms an unceremonious sacking into a heroic act of self-sacrifice. Side effects may include public nausea, uncontrollable laughter, and the slow death of whatever credibility the administration had left.

    3. The P52-Billion (or Was It P100-Billion?) Vanishing Flood Trick

    While Metro Manila drowns every July, someone allegedly performed the greatest magic act in legislative history: making tens of billions in flood-control funds disappear into thin air – or, more likely, into very specific pockets.
    Abracadabra! Ghost projects appear!
    Presto! The money is gone!
    For the grand finale: blame the guy we just “accepted the resignation” of – even though he swears he never resigned.

    4. “He Had to Go” – A Phrase That Should Chill Every Filipino Spine

    Those four little words Bersamin let slip – “Sinabi sa akin na kailangan ko nang umalis” – are the political equivalent of hearing the safety click off.
    When the former Chief Justice, the Little President himself, is told “you have to go” and then watches the Palace rewrite history in real time, we are no longer watching a reshuffle.
    We are watching a palace coup disguised as delicadeza.

    5. The Palace School of Creative Writing: How to Announce a Non-Existent Resignation

    • Lesson #1: Never let facts get in the way of a good narrative.
    • Lesson #2: When cornered, simply repeat: “The announcement came from Malacañang.”
    • Lesson #3: If the ex-official contradicts you on national TV, pretend you’re discussing the weather.
    • Extra credit: Use the phrase “presidential prerogative” until people fall asleep.

    6. The Bersamin Contradiction Is Now a National Emergency

    When the second most powerful man in government and the Palace cannot agree on whether he quit or was pushed, we have crossed into banana-republic territory – except even bananas have documentation.
    This is not a gaffe. This is a constitutional crisis wearing the cheap costume of a press briefing.

    7. One Simple Demand Before the Next Typhoon Kills Again

    Publish the damn letter.
    All of it. Unredacted. Today.
    Let the Filipino people read for themselves whether Lucas Bersamin wrote “I hereby resign” or whether he wrote the bureaucratic equivalent of “Do whatever you want with me, boss.”

    If the letter says he resigned – great, Bersamin is the liar.
    If the letter says nothing of the sort – congratulations, Malacañang, you just confessed to the nation that you will lie about anything, even the exit of your own alter-ego, to save the President’s skin.

    Your move, Palace.

    Because the floods are coming again.
    And this time, the Filipino people have every right to ask:
    Are we drowning in water… or in lies?

    Hold them accountable.
    Or prepare to swim.

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “I’m calling you from my new Globe SIM. Send load!”

    https://kwebanibarok.com/2024/09/04/a-cat-astrophic-error-globe-telecoms-sim-registration-tailspin/

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “Mahiya Naman Kayo!” Marcos’ Anti-Corruption Vow Faces a Flood of Doubt

    By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo — August 2, 2025

    Executive Summary: Can Marcos Break the Cycle of Corruption?

    President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s fiery 2025 SONA pledge to expose and prosecute corruption in failed flood control projects taps into public fury over persistent flooding and squandered funds. His call to shame negligent officials and publish project data signals bold intent, but the Marcos family’s notorious history—linked to $5-10 billion in plundered wealth—casts doubt on sincerity.

    Digital transparency and public pressure offer hope, yet entrenched patronage, a sluggish judiciary (8% conviction rate), and selective enforcement loom as barriers. The narrow focus on infrastructure sidesteps broader corruption in healthcare and local governance. Success demands independent oversight, robust whistleblower protections, and judicial reform. Without tackling elite impunity, this risks becoming empty rhetoric. Civil society, international partners, and citizens must hold Marcos accountable through data-driven monitoring and civic action to ensure reforms stick within 12-18 months.

    Credibility Check: Is Marcos’ Anti-Corruption Vow Trustworthy?

    Marcos’ pledge to combat flood project corruption, delivered with a dramatic “Mahiya naman kayo” in his 2025 SONA, resonates with Filipinos fed up with flooded streets and broken promises. Yet, the Marcos name—tied to Ferdinand Sr.’s regime, which siphoned $5-10 billion from public coffers—invites skepticism. Ongoing unpaid tax liabilities and social media campaigns whitewashing martial law abuses further erode trust.

    Specific commitments include tasking the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) to compile and publicize a list of flood control projects and launching audits via Regional Project Monitoring Committees. These are concrete, measurable steps. However, similar transparency vows under Aquino and Duterte yielded only an 8% conviction rate for graft cases (2016-2023).

    Marcos’ high approval rating (68% in June 2025 Pulse Asia) offers political capital, but dynastic ties—relatives control key local posts with flood contracts—raise fears of selective prosecutions. Vague promises of “charges in coming months” lack timelines or named targets, unlike Singapore’s rigorous asset declaration mandates. Without judicial reform or elite accountability, this risks being performative posturing.

    Stakeholder Showdown: Who’s Betting on Marcos, and Who’s Not?

    Marcos’ Cheerleaders: Why Some See a Path to Victory

    Supporters argue Marcos’ plan could succeed by leveraging public outrage and institutional tools. Publicizing project data, as mandated to DPWH, invites scrutiny from groups like Procurement Watch, mirroring global transparency successes. Digital governance—e-bidding and geotagged tracking—aligns with UNODC’s praise for reducing bribery.

    Post-midterm political pressure, with 2028 elections looming, pushes Marcos to deliver visible wins. International validation, including FATF grey list removal, bolsters credibility. High-profile prosecutions could deter future corruption, especially if DPWH audits uncover hard evidence.

    The Doubters: Why History and Structure Spell Trouble

    Skeptics point to insurmountable barriers. The Marcos family’s cronyism legacy—with relatives holding governorships and mayorships tied to flood contracts—suggests conflicts of interest. Patronage politics, where DPWH directors are political appointees, undermines impartiality.

    The Sandiganbayan’s 1,800+ backlog and 7-10 year case resolutions signal judicial gridlock. Past anti-corruption drives, like Duterte’s Build-Build-Build audits, fizzled with minimal convictions. Social media disinformation glorifying the Marcos era, as noted in 2022 election reports, dulls public pressure.

    Critics argue the focus on flood projects ignores broader corruption in healthcare and local governance, per business surveys.

    The Middle Ground: Forces That Could Tip the Scales

    Public intolerance, especially among youth using platforms like X to expose corruption, creates reform momentum. Digital tools like e-procurement systems reduce human discretion, but require scaling. Extreme weather—2024-25’s record La Niña—complicates project evaluations, as some failures stem from design flaws, not just corruption.

    Donors like ADB and JICA, withholding funds pending transparency, could enforce compliance but risk politicization in the 2025 election season.

    Systemic Smackdown: Are Marcos’ Fixes Big Enough for the Mess?

    Marcos’ plan—public lists and audits—tackles visible flood project failures but falls short of corruption’s vast scope, costing the Philippines ₱700 billion annually. Infrastructure markups of 20-30% reflect patronage networks, judicial weaknesses, and dynastic control, with 80% of local posts held by families. The measures address symptoms, not root causes.

    Global models, like Singapore’s independent CPIB or Georgia’s post-2003 judicial overhaul, emphasize autonomous agencies and swift prosecutions. The Philippines’ Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan lack resources and independence, with an 8% conviction rate.

    Marcos’ digital push—e-bidding and geotagging—is promising but needs training and infrastructure to scale. Patronage and disinformation, fueled by pro-Marcos propaganda, hinder cultural change. Delayed COA reports (12-24 months) and unaddressed poverty-driven corruption limit impact. Sustainability beyond 2025 elections is shaky without elite accountability.

    Battle Plan: Actionable Steps to Crush Corruption

    Government Institutions

    • Fortify Oversight: Grant Ombudsman and COA full independence by Q2 2026; double Sandiganbayan divisions for 90-day case resolutions using e-subpoenas.
    • Go Digital: Launch real-time DPWH data portals by Q1 2026, using blockchain for billing transparency.
    • Protect Whistleblowers: Enact laws by Q1 2026, offering 1% of recovered funds as bounties and overseas relocation, funded by Presidential Social Fund.

    Civil Society Organizations

    • Citizen Audits: Form a Citizen Flood Audit Corps by Q2 2026, training 1,000 volunteers for drone surveys, partnered with AFP for security.
    • Anti-Dynasty Push: Advocate for 1987 Constitution enforcement to curb dynastic control by 2027.

    International Partners

    • Tech Support: ADB and JICA fund LGU training on e-procurement by Q3 2026, tying aid to transparency.
    • Global Standards: Back UNCAC implementation for ownership registries by 2027.

    Citizens and Media

    • Crowdsource Evidence: Create X-based dashboards by Q1 2026 to track DPWH disclosures.
    • Educate: Push integrity curricula by 2026-27, countering disinformation with CHED support.

    Success Metrics

    • Short-Term (12-18 months): Publish flood data by Q1 2026; charge 50+ officials; boost e-procurement by 20%.
    • Long-Term: Cut cost overruns by 10% by 2027; raise convictions to 15%; establish 5 graft courts.

    These evidence-based steps, inspired by global successes, balance immediate wins with systemic change, leveraging public and international pressure to sustain reforms.

    Final Verdict: Can Marcos Turn Words into Action?

    President Marcos’ “Mahiya Naman Kayo!” rallying cry against corruption in flood control projects captures public frustration but faces a steep climb to deliver lasting change. While his transparency pledges and digital reforms show promise, the Marcos family’s historical baggage, entrenched patronage networks, and a limping judiciary (with an 8% conviction rate) threaten to drown these efforts in skepticism.

    Success demands more than fiery rhetoric—it requires independent oversight, robust whistleblower protections, and prosecutions that target elites, not just scapegoats. By leveraging UNODC-backed digital tools, civil society momentum, and international pressure, Marcos could build trust within 12-18 months.

    Yet, without dismantling dynastic power and addressing systemic corruption beyond infrastructure, this crusade risks fading into political noise. Citizens, media, and global partners must hold the administration accountable, ensuring promises translate into measurable outcomes by 2027.

    Key Citations

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “Meow, I’m calling you from my new Globe SIM!”

    https://kwebanibarok.com/2024/09/04/a-cat-astrophic-error-globe-telecoms-sim-registration-tailspin/

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “PLUNDER IS OVERRATED”? TRY AGAIN — IT’S A CALCULATED KILL SHOT
    Why Ombudsman Remulla’s “No-Plunder” Gambit Is the Smartest Anti-Corruption Move Since the Wheel

    By Louis “Barok” C. Biraogo — November 4, 2025

    THE MOB’S HOLY WAR: “PLUNDER!” SCREAMED LOUDER THAN LOGIC

    The mob is drunk on drama. PLUNDER! PLUNDER! PLUNDER! — chanted like a war cry at a frat hazing. Meanwhile, Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla drops a line that should be tattooed on every prosecutor’s forearm: “Plunder is overrated.”

    Cue the meltdown.

    “Whitewash!” scream the keyboard crusaders. “Downgrade!” wail the TikTok tribunes. “He’s shielding the big fish!” howls the echo chamber of eternal outrage.

    Wake up, clowns. Remulla isn’t soft on corruption — he’s surgically ruthless about convictions. His “plunder is overrated” quip isn’t surrender. It’s a declaration of war fought with precision weapons, not fireworks.

    THE LEGAL REALIST’S KNOCKOUT: WHY THIS IS A PROSECUTORIAL CHECKMATE

    Critics screech: “They’re downgrading the charges!”
    Reality: They’re upgrading the probability of actual prison time.

    Let’s dismantle the hysteria with cold, hard law:

    Charge Legal Basis Evidentiary Burden Penalty
    Plunder Republic Act No. 7080 (Anti-Plunder Act) Prove series/combination of overt acts + ≥₱50M ill-gotten wealth Reclusion perpetua
    Malversation Article 217, Revised Penal Code (RPC) Funds missing + public officer accountable → presumption of guilt Up to life if >₱8.8M
    Bribery Article 210, RPC Gift + official act = done 6–15 years
    Falsification Article 171, RPC Fake docs to steal public funds 6–20 years

    Prosecutorial Discretion? Absolute.
    Section 15, Republic Act No. 6770 (Ombudsman Act) gives Remulla sole authority to file charges “warranted by the evidence.” Not by rally decibels.

    Supreme Court Precedent? Crystal clear.

    Remulla looked at this graveyard of failed plunder cases and said: “Not today.”

    THE CRITICS’ CIRCUS: A PARADE OF PERFORMATIVE PIETY

    Critic’s Tantrum Barok’s Haymaker
    “Downgrading the charges!” No — upgrading the odds of handcuffs. A malversation win = jail + asset freeze + lifetime ban.
    “This is a whitewash!” Filing 6 cases by Nov. 25 is action. The real whitewash? A plunder case that collapses in 10 years, freeing everyone.
    “The public wants PLUNDER!” Justice isn’t a teleserye. Convictions > hashtags.

    These aren’t legal analysts. They’re rage influencers. They want spectacle. Remulla wants scalps.

    THE 4D CHESSBOARD: SHOCK, AWE, AND FLIP

    This isn’t the finale. It’s Phase One of a takedown.

    1. File slam-dunk charges now → Secure immediate convictions.
    2. Freeze assets → No loot escapes.
    3. Flip the minnows → DPWH (Department of Public Works and Highways) underlings become state witnesses.
    4. Build plunder later → With forensic audits, flipped testimony, and frozen paper trails.

    If evidence never hits ₱50M? Then plunder was never warranted. That’s not weakness. That’s integrity.

    THE PLAYBOOK: HOW TO SILENCE THE NOISE

    To the Office of the Ombudsman:

    1. Drop a legal memo by Nov. 10 — bullet-pointed, public, brutal:
    • “No plunder in Batch 1: Gaps in pattern/amount.”
    • “Filing: Malversation, Bribery, Falsification.”
    • “Next: Forensic audit for Batch 2.”
    1. Livestream the Nov. 25 filing → Let the nation watch the informations hit the Sandiganbayan docket.
    2. Blacklist the 15 contractors → No more public funds. Ever.

    THE FINAL VERDICT: REMULLA ISN’T DODGING — HE’S DOMINATING

    While critics scream into the void, Remulla is building airtight cases that will fill prison cells.

    He’s not grandstanding.
    He’s prosecuting.

    When the first lawmaker is dragged out in cuffs — when billions are clawed back — the same critics will go radio silent.

    Because results > rallies.

    Remulla didn’t dodge the fight. He rewrote the rules of engagement.

    History will call this prosecutorial genius.

    Key Citations

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “Shimenet”: The Term That Broke the Internet and the Budget

    HAVE you heard of “Shimenet”?  No, it’s not a secret government program, a new flavor of ice cream, or a hidden island paradise.  It’s the latest meme sensation sweeping the Philippines, thanks to an unexpected gaffe by Vice President Sara Duterte during a budget hearing.  Turns out, even the hallowed halls of Congress can’t escape the power of the internet, and “shimenet” is proof that sometimes, the most serious situations can lead to the funniest results.

    But first, let’s talk about the glorious Filipino tradition of poking fun at, well, everything. From the “Pepsi Paloma” mystery to “Asiong Salonga,” every nook and cranny of Philippine life is fodder for jokes, memes, and tweets. When former President Duterte made a habit of inventing new meanings for existing words, did we bat an eyelash? Of course not. We turned them into viral content. And now, following in the same linguistic footsteps, his daughter Sara has unwittingly given us “shimenet.”

    So what is “shimenet”? Let’s dive into its humble origins. Picture it: August 2024, the air thick with anticipation, as Congress grills the Vice President about the mysterious disappearance of P125 million in confidential funds. House Assistant Minority Leader Arlene Brosas, ever the watchdog, demanded answers. And in classic Duterte fashion, Sara responded with a sequence of words that have now become immortalized: “She may not like my answer. She may not like how I answer. She may not like the content of my answer, but I am answering.” Simple, right? Well, it would have been if not for her peculiar pronunciation, which morphed “she may not” into what our ears happily embraced as “shimenet.”

    From that moment on, “shimenet” was unleashed upon the world, and the internet responded with all the subtlety of a fiesta in full swing. It quickly became a catch-all term, much like “Bahala na si Batman” or “Pwede na ‘yan,” capturing the very essence of evasiveness with a dash of nonchalance. Have a problem? Shimenet. Need to explain where millions in taxpayer money went? Shimenet. Struggling to justify the budget for a mysterious 2025 OVP project? Just shimenet it.

    Now, as the debate rages on about the 2025 OVP budget, “shimenet” has become the go-to defense. Why does the OVP need another P125 million in confidential funds? Well, the answer is simple: shimenet. Is this budget justified given the current economic situation? Of course, because—say it with me now—shimenet! The critics, on the other hand, argue that “shimenet” is just a convenient smokescreen to avoid real answers, akin to putting lipstick on a pig, but a very expensive pig funded by taxpayer money.

    Even the proposed OVP projects for 2025 have not escaped the “shimenet” treatment. Plans for a series of “confidential” public engagements, budget allocations for “classified” educational programs, and a “top-secret” tour of government-funded infrastructure all fell under the mystical umbrella of shimenet. Opponents of these initiatives demand clarity and specifics, while supporters argue that “shimenet” is the new standard operating procedure—why mess with success?

    So, what’s a nation to do? In the spirit of “shimenet,” I humbly offer the following recommendations:

    1. For the Government: When in doubt, “shimenet.” It’s a proven tactic that sidesteps accountability while providing just enough vagueness to keep the critics at bay. Who needs transparency when you can “shimenet” your way through the most probing questions?
    2. For the Critics: Embrace the “shimenet” mindset! Instead of wasting time demanding answers, why not just add “shimenet” to your political vocabulary? After all, it’s much more satisfying than the usual “no comment.”
    3. For the Filipino People: Let’s continue to celebrate “shimenet” as the linguistic embodiment of our unique political landscape. Why settle for transparency and accountability when we can have the comforting ambiguity of “shimenet”? Besides, it’s much more fun to meme.

    “Shimenet” – the word that’s become a viral sensation, a symbol of the Philippines’ love for memes, and maybe even a new way to approach budgeting.  Who knows, maybe the OVP will soon be offering “shimenet” workshops, teaching everyone how to turn their budget woes into internet gold.  After all, in a nation where turning the mundane into meme gold is practically a national pastime, what else could we expect?  “Shimenet” – the word that’s got everyone talking, laughing, and wondering what’s next.

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “We Did Not Yield”: Marcos’s Stand and the Soul of Filipino Sovereignty

    By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo — June 28, 2025

    A Fisherman’s Dreams Dashed on the Waves

    Tolomeo Forones, a 70-year-old fisherman from Masinloc, Philippines, once sailed to Scarborough Shoal with hope in his heart and nets full of promise. His hands, etched with the labor of decades, hauled in catches worth $705 every three months—enough to feed his family and settle debts. Now, he sits on the shore, his boat tethered, staring at a horizon patrolled by Chinese Coast Guard vessels armed with water cannons and menace. “We borrow just to eat,” he told me, his voice cracking under the weight of loss. Tolomeo’s story echoes across the West Philippine Sea (WPS), where thousands of fishermen are caught in the crosshairs of a geopolitical standoff, their livelihoods sacrificed to a superpower’s ambition. This isn’t just a territorial dispute—it’s a human tragedy, where families go hungry while leaders trade bold words.

    President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. recently declared, “We did not yield,” vowing to defend Filipino sovereignty in the WPS. But for Tolomeo, the question isn’t whether Marcos stands firm—it’s whether his government, and the world, will fight for the people who call these waters home or leave them to sink into poverty and despair.

    Unveiling the Layers of a Global Heist

    The WPS crisis lays bare a brutal power imbalance: China, a global titan, bullies a smaller nation with impunity. Beijing’s “nine-dash line” claim, struck down by the 2016 Hague ruling, swallows nearly the entire South China Sea, including the Philippines’ 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Chinese vessels harass Filipino fishermen, block supply missions, and construct artificial islands atop razed coral reefs, flouting international law. This is no mere dispute—it’s a calculated campaign to dominate, echoing imperial conquests of centuries past, from the Opium Wars to today’s militarized reefs.

    Economic Plunder: The WPS holds 12,158 billion cubic feet of natural gas and 6,203 million barrels of oil—resources that could fuel the Philippines’ future. Yet Chinese intimidation halts exploration, chaining the nation to costly energy imports. Fisheries, employing 1.6 million Filipinos and contributing 1.3% to GDP, suffer most. In 2024, 77 Chinese-flagged vessels illegally fished in the Philippines’ EEZ, driving a 6.78% drop in fish catch and a 0.02% GDP loss from mid-2021 to mid-2022. Coastal communities face 17,000 lost jobs and 24,000 more Filipinos pushed into poverty. While China plunders the sea, families like Tolomeo’s spiral into debt.

    Marcos’s Gambit: Marcos’s “no yield” rhetoric aims to ignite national pride, but its impact is murky. His administration has bolstered ties with the U.S., Japan, and Australia, and launched a transparency initiative, inviting journalists to witness Chinese aggression. Initiatives like the LAYAG-WPS Project offer fishermen fuel subsidies, but these are mere patches on a gaping wound. Critics question whether Marcos’s defiance masks political posturing, with defense modernization lagging and corruption scandals undermining trust. His family’s past—his father’s regime cozied up to China while neglecting fishermen—raises doubts: Is this a fight for sovereignty or a bid to polish a tarnished legacy before 2028?

    Global Hypocrisy Exposed: The international response is a masterclass in empty promises. The U.S. reaffirms its Mutual Defense Treaty, patrolling with freedom-of-navigation operations, while allies like Japan and the EU decry China’s actions. But where is the action that matters—sanctions, trade pressure, or UN-backed enforcement? The 2016 Hague ruling, a beacon of international law, lies ignored as China’s defiance goes unchecked. This reveals a bitter truth: global institutions falter when powerful nations opt for expediency, leaving countries like the Philippines to face giants alone.

    Echoes of History, Shadows of Betrayal

    The WPS crisis is a modern chapter in a centuries-old saga of territorial greed, where human lives are pawns in strategic games. The Philippines’ colonial past—Spanish, then American—left it vulnerable to external powers. The 1898 Treaty of Paris and 1900 Treaty of Washington defined its maritime borders, but post-colonial leaders struggled to enforce them. Rodrigo Duterte’s dismissal of the 2016 ruling for Chinese economic favors mirrored earlier betrayals, like Gloria Arroyo’s 2005 joint exploration deal with China, which violated the Constitution. Each compromise emboldened Beijing, proving Marcos’s warning: “Give them an inch, they’ll take a mile.”

    China’s tactics—artificial islands as military outposts, illegal fishing bans—mirror its regional playbook, from the Spratly Islands to Japan’s Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute. For the Philippines, this is a battle for more than resources; it’s a stand for dignity, a nation refusing to bow. Yet the Marcos legacy complicates this narrative. Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s 1978 claim to the Kalayaan Island Group was bold, but his regime’s corruption and abuses fractured unity. Can his son, with three years left, redeem this history, or is he merely staging a performance for political gain?

    Questions That Demand Answers

    Marcos’s defiance raises searing questions. Is his “no yield” stance a true shield for Filipinos or a distraction from domestic failures like inflation and electoral losses? His cabinet reshuffles signal urgency, but do they deliver aid to fishermen or just bureaucratic chaos? How do we weigh the urgent needs of families like Tolomeo’s against the long-term goal of deterring China? Escalation risks war, potentially pulling in the U.S. and upending the region. Accommodation, as Duterte tried, surrenders sovereignty and invites further aggression. What’s the true price of each choice?

    Globally, why does “support” for the Philippines stop at words? The U.S. and allies fear China’s economic clout, but doesn’t their inaction embolden Beijing? For Filipinos, how much trust should they place in a government that promises change but struggles to deliver? The LAYAG-WPS Project is a step, but fishermen need boats and protection, not platitudes, to face Chinese intimidation. These questions aren’t rhetorical—they demand accountability from Manila to Washington.

    Charting a Course Through the Storm

    The WPS crisis tests the Philippines’ resolve, international law’s strength, and humanity’s commitment to justice over power. Here are three bold recommendations to forge a path forward:

    1. Lifeline for Fishermen Now: Expand the LAYAG-WPS Project to equip fishermen with modern boats, satellite communication, and legal aid to document Chinese harassment. Local governments must offer zero-interest loans and alternative livelihoods like aquaculture to end debt cycles. International donors, led by the U.S. and Japan, should commit $50 million yearly to support 50,000 coastal families, ensuring immediate relief.
    2. Forge a United Front: The Philippines must spearhead an ASEAN coalition to negotiate a binding South China Sea Code of Conduct, backed by UN sanctions for violations. Marcos should host a 2026 WPS summit, rallying allies like Vietnam and Indonesia, with the EU and Australia as mediators. This would isolate China diplomatically unless it honors UNCLOS.
    3. Build a Resilient Shield: Accelerate the Comprehensive Archipelagic Defense Concept, dedicating 2% of GDP to modernize the navy and coast guard by 2028. Transparent budgeting is non-negotiable to prevent corruption. The U.S. and Japan should co-fund joint exercises and supply patrol vessels, while Manila develops clear rules of engagement to deter China without sparking conflict.

    Long-term, a just resolution demands a world where international law has teeth. Reform global institutions to enforce rulings like the 2016 award with trade penalties or asset freezes. For the Philippines, sustainability lies in diversifying its economy—investing in renewable energy and marine conservation to reduce reliance on contested waters.

    Your Voice Can Save a Sea

    Tolomeo Forones doesn’t seek sympathy—he demands his sea, his dignity, his life back. His struggle, shared by millions of Filipinos, reminds us that sovereignty is more than maps; it’s the right to thrive. Marcos’s vow to “not yield” is a spark, but it needs fuel—action from Manila, pressure from allies, and voices like yours. The Philippines, with the world’s backing, must protect its people, uphold international law, and build a future where small nations stand tall.

    You can act. Urge your leaders—in Washington, Tokyo, Brussels—to match their words with sanctions and aid. Support groups like the National Federation of Fisherfolk Organizations, amplifying Filipino voices. Share Tolomeo’s story, because every share stokes the fire of change. The West Philippine Sea isn’t a far-off problem—it’s a test of our collective resolve. Will we pass it?

    Key Citations

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • “We Gather Light to Scatter”: A Tribute to Edgardo Bautista Espiritu

    By Louis ‘Barok‘ C Biraogo — April 29, 2025

    THE measure of a life is not in years alone, but in the luminous traces it leaves behind—echoes of integrity, acts of courage, and the quiet, steadfast labor of love for one’s community. In the passing of Edgardo Bautista Espiritu, the Upsilon Sigma Phi fraternity, the University of the Philippines, and the Philippines itself have lost not merely a distinguished fellow, but a man who embodied the fraternity’s imperatives: Lux in Tenebris, light in darkness.

    A Life of Principle and Illumination

    Espiritu, batch ’55, was a gatherer and scatterer of light in equal measure. His career—banker, diplomat, Secretary of Finance, UP Regent—was a tapestry of service woven with threads of unyielding principle. When the Asian Financial Crisis threatened to unravel the nation’s economy in 1998, he stood as a bulwark, steering policy with the steady hand of a man who understood that finance was not mere arithmetic but moral architecture. And when corruption festered in the highest offices, he did not look away. His resignation from the Estrada administration and subsequent testimony in the impeachment trial were acts of rare moral clarity, even as they invited death threats that forced him into exile. Yet exile did not dim his light; it only refracted it across oceans, as he later served as Ambassador to the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Iceland, carrying the dignity of his nation with him.

    The Upsilonian Spirit: Brotherhood Beyond Brotherhood

    To his brothers in Upsilon Sigma Phi, Espiritu was both torchbearer and compass. His leadership on the UP Board of Regents (1985–2000) was not merely administrative but visionary, ensuring that the university remained a crucible for minds destined to shape the nation. The fraternity’s motto—“We Gather Light to Scatter”—found its living testament in him. Whether presiding over Metrobank, the Philippine National Bank, or the UP Alumni Association, he understood that true leadership was not about accumulation but dissemination—of knowledge, opportunity, and, above all, integrity.

    The Unimpeachable Man

    To speak of Espiritu is to speak of a man whose character was, as the UP citation declared, unimpeachable. His advocacy against judicial corruption was not abstract idealism but hard-won conviction. “A judiciary that dispenses fair and impartial justice,” he argued, “is a requirement for attracting investors… and is therefore a key ingredient for economic growth.” Here was a man who saw the interconnectedness of things—the rule of law as the foundation of prosperity, education as the bedrock of citizenship.

    Legacy: The Light That Remains

    His physical presence is gone, but the light he gathered and scattered endures: in the Ang Bahay ng Alumni building he helped erect, in the banks he steadied, in the students and fraternity brothers who carry his example forward. The TOFIL Award (1988), the UP Most Distinguished Alumnus honor (2019), and the Doctor of Laws honoris causa (2020) are not mere accolades but waypoints in a life lived without compromise.

    A Final Farewell

    To Brod Ed, to the Espiritu family, to the Upsilon Sigma Phi—we mourn, but we also celebrate. For men like Espiritu do not truly depart. They become part of the fraternity’s marrow, the university’s soul, the nation’s memory. In the quiet of a chapel, in the laughter of brothers reminiscing, in the resolve of a young student inspired by his story—there, his light still flickers.

    Requiescat in pace, et lux perpetua luceat ei.

    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo
  • $150M for Kaufman to Spin a Sinking Narrative

    By Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo — July 10, 2025

    LET’S not pretend the International Criminal Court’s case against Rodrigo Duterte is a grand geopolitical chess game. It’s simpler, uglier: a reckoning for a man who turned the Philippines into a slaughterhouse, leaving 6,000 to 30,000 dead in his “war on drugs.” Yet, here we are, watching a farce unfold, with Duterte’s lawyer, Nicholas Kaufman, and the Marcos administration’s mouthpiece, Claire Castro, trading barbs like actors in a bad telenovela. The hypocrisy is thicker than Manila’s smog, and the moral clarity is nowhere to be found.

    Kaufman’s Desperate Deflection

    Nicholas Kaufman, Duterte’s high-priced legal shield, wants to toss Senator Imee Marcos’s committee report into the ICC’s lap as “proof” of political maneuvering. This is less a defense strategy than a magician’s trick—look over here at the shiny “political persecution” narrative, not at the bodies piling up. The report, penned under Imee Marcos’s watchful eye, screams political theater. The Marcos family, once airlifted out of Malacañang in disgrace, now postures as the arbiter of due process for a man who bragged about tossing critics from helicopters. Spoiler: The ICC isn’t here for Manila’s soap opera. It’s here for the blood.

    Kaufman’s argument—that Duterte’s arrest violated Philippine law—might thrill the home crowd, but it’s irrelevant in The Hague. The ICC exists because local systems like the Philippines’ spectacularly failed, convicting only four low-ranking officers for thousands of killings. If that’s “due process,” then impunity is the national anthem. Kaufman’s rumored $150 million fee (whispered on X, unverified but plausible) buys a lot of bluster, but it won’t erase Duterte’s own words: he ordered killings. The ICC doesn’t care about your senator’s report, Nicholas. It cares about corpses.

    Castro’s Crocodile Tears

    Enter Claire Castro, Palace Press Officer and lawyer, clutching her pearls over Kaufman’s “exorbitant fees” and urging him to “do better” (Inquirer.net, July 8, 2025). She’s not wrong—Kaufman’s fixation on politics dodges the gut-punch of Duterte’s admissions. But let’s not pretend the Marcos administration is a beacon of moral virtue. Their newfound love for the ICC only bloomed after a 2024 spat with Duterte, when political expediency replaced their earlier cries of “sovereignty.” Castro’s sanctimonious call to focus on the allegations is rich, given President Marcos Jr.’s initial resistance to the ICC probe. This isn’t justice; it’s a vendetta dressed in legalese.

    Castro’s right that the ICC judges aren’t blind. They’ll see through Imee Marcos’s report, a document as credible as a tabloid horoscope, crafted by pro-Duterte senators in a hearing that was more performance art than fact-finding (Philstar.com, July 8, 2025). But her own government’s cooperation with the ICC is as sincere as a TikTok apology video—conveniently timed to weaken a political rival. The Marcoses playing the “rule of law” card is like a fox guarding the henhouse.

    The Sovereignty Smokescreen

    Duterte’s howls of “foreign interference” are a tired gambit. The victims of his drug war—overwhelmingly poor Filipinos like Kian delos Santos (17), Althea Barbon (4), and Myca Ulpina (3)—weren’t killed by The Hague’s bureaucrats. They were gunned down by a system Duterte proudly orchestrated. The ICC’s jurisdiction kicks in when local courts fail, and with 30,000 dead and near-zero accountability, Manila’s justice system is a graveyard of good intentions (Human Rights Watch, March 12, 2025). Duterte’s sovereignty shtick is just that—a shtick, one the Marcoses happily echo when it suits them. Imee’s report isn’t a defense; it’s a family feud masquerading as principle.

    The Ghosts Demand Justice

    Duterte’s bravado—boasting he’d “double the EJKs” if re-elected—isn’t just a legal liability; it’s a moral indictment. The ICC’s task is to prove these weren’t mere tough-guy quips but a systematic policy of slaughter. The evidence is overwhelming: over 1,000 items disclosed to the defense, Duterte’s own admissions in 2024 congressional hearings, and the cries of victims’ families (ICC Official Statement, March 12, 2025). Kaufman’s procedural nitpicking won’t bring back Kian, Althea, or Myca, children whose only crime was being born poor in Duterte’s Philippines. This “war” treated poverty as a death sentence, and no Senate report can whitewash that.

    A Scathing To-Do List for the Morally Challenged

    • To the ICC: Cut through the noise. This case isn’t about Manila’s political squabbles—it’s about whether a leader can orchestrate mass murder and retire to a beach villa. Spoiler: He shouldn’t. Focus on the evidence, not the melodrama.
    • To Kaufman: If you’re charging nine figures, at least craft a defense that doesn’t collapse under scrutiny. “Political persecution” might play on SMNI News, but the ICC runs on facts, not conspiracies. Try harder.
    • To Castro: Drop the holier-than-thou act. Your boss’s sudden ICC enthusiasm is as principled as a used-car salesman’s pitch. Push for real police reform, not just press releases.
    • To Manila’s Elites: Stop treating justice as a pawn in your power games. The dead deserve better than your bickering.

    The Final Reckoning

    The ICC’s legitimacy is on shaky ground, but letting Duterte walk would be its death knell. This case is a test: Will the court be a watchdog for the powerless or a lapdog for the powerful? In the Philippines, political elites squabble over scraps of influence while the ghosts of the drug war—Kian, Althea, Myca, and thousands more—lie silent. Their blood demands a verdict, not a circus.

    Key Citations

    1. Philstar.com, July 8, 2025: Reports Claire Castro’s urging for Kaufman to focus on disproving EJK allegations rather than political maneuvering.
    2. Inquirer.net, July 8, 2025: Details Castro’s critique of Kaufman’s defense strategy and alleged exorbitant fees.
    3. International Criminal Court, March 12, 2025: Official ICC statement on Duterte’s custody and the charges against him for crimes against humanity.
    4. Human Rights Watch, March 12, 2025: Discusses Duterte’s arrest on an ICC warrant and the context of his drug war’s human rights violations.
    5. GMA News Online, March 27, 2025: Covers the Senate committee report led by Imee Marcos, alleging violations of Duterte’s rights during his arrest.
    Louis ‘Barok‘ C. Biraogo

Leave a comment

Hello,

I’m Louis ‘Barok’ Biraogo

Let’s connect

Join the fun!

Stay updated with our latest tutorials and ideas by joining our newsletter.

Recent posts